Home » Dan Benjamin
About Dan Benjamin
Find out more about Dan's work.
Researchers representing a wide range of disciplines and statistical perspectives—72 of us in total—propose to redefine statistical significance. For claims of discoveries of novel effects, we advocate a change in the P-value threshold for a “statistically significant” result from 0.05 to 0.005. Results currently called “significant” that do not meet the new threshold would be called suggestive and treated as ambiguous as to whether there is an effect.
Repairing Democracy: We Can’t All Get What We Want, But Can We Avoid Getting What Most of Us *Really* Don’t Want?
This post illustrates what multicandidate open voting could look like if voters had the option to vote for one candidate, to vote against one candidate, or to rate all the different candidates in more complex ways. Data collected in the heat of the 2016 US presidential primaries suggests that the result would have been dramatically different than under the current system. (more…)
Genoeconomics is a new field that focuses on incorporating genomic data in economic research. As genomic data becomes widely available and dramatically less expensive to collect, genoeconomics seems poised to become a large and influential area of research. (more…)
Many governments around the world have been expressing interest in conducting surveys to measure national well-being and in using the results to guide policy. But there remain many open questions. (more…)